The best of all possible worlds is for the government to stay
out-of-the-way of commerce, industry and business, and very rarely
institute regulations. There are some times when government and
businesses, industry associations should collaborate for the sake of
standardization, but again, very rarely. The tendency to allow industry
collusion, create monopolies, duopolies or quasi-cartels is just too
easy. Further, once you create one regulation it's hard to prevent the
add-on affect, the temptation is just too great to add exceptions,
additions, clarifications as lawyers, unions, and consumer groups work
to lobby legislators to intervene with the regulatory apparatus.
A few years back this was a big conversation at our Think Tank, and one think tanker Andrew stated: "I would have to agree that businesses do need some form of standardization, but we must also understand several concepts! A business must have the capability to micromanage for maximum efficiency. I believe states should be granted the power to standardize businesses, not the federal government."
Okay but, where I see the definite need for standardization are with things like Internet Protocols, railway track width, freeways for intrastate travel, airport runway markings, frequencies used in communication, food safety, etc. In a big state like TX you could get away with doing almost everything counter to the overall prevailing way of doing things, it's practically large enough to be its own country, and some Texans would prefer it to be still. Pretty independent minded, even with the population's mindset of succession from the union. It even has its own electrical grid.
Still, with regards to the flow of energy, transportation, distribution, communication, currency, etc. we need standardization. And to the point of having each state decide, what about every county, every city, or every HOA, down to every person, where do you stop the breakdown of centralized standardization.
The argument for state level standardization could be argued against by someone who is a County Supervisor telling the State to go to hell, we want to do it our way, especially a county like the County of Los Angeles, with 16 million people in it, also larger than most countries. How about a city telling the county where to go, again as an example, let's take the City of Los Angeles VS County of Los Angeles, see the point.
And realize I am not making an argument for a global government here, but we also need some standardization there too, for aviation, which we do have, maritime, trade rules, and having the Central Banks work together so no one Central Bank doesn't destroy the entire global economy. See that point. We need SOME standardization, but we MUST retain regional variation. We do this at the Global Level, but we don't do it enough at our Federal Level with regards to the states in the US and that's why we have issues now. Think on this.
A few years back this was a big conversation at our Think Tank, and one think tanker Andrew stated: "I would have to agree that businesses do need some form of standardization, but we must also understand several concepts! A business must have the capability to micromanage for maximum efficiency. I believe states should be granted the power to standardize businesses, not the federal government."
Okay but, where I see the definite need for standardization are with things like Internet Protocols, railway track width, freeways for intrastate travel, airport runway markings, frequencies used in communication, food safety, etc. In a big state like TX you could get away with doing almost everything counter to the overall prevailing way of doing things, it's practically large enough to be its own country, and some Texans would prefer it to be still. Pretty independent minded, even with the population's mindset of succession from the union. It even has its own electrical grid.
Still, with regards to the flow of energy, transportation, distribution, communication, currency, etc. we need standardization. And to the point of having each state decide, what about every county, every city, or every HOA, down to every person, where do you stop the breakdown of centralized standardization.
The argument for state level standardization could be argued against by someone who is a County Supervisor telling the State to go to hell, we want to do it our way, especially a county like the County of Los Angeles, with 16 million people in it, also larger than most countries. How about a city telling the county where to go, again as an example, let's take the City of Los Angeles VS County of Los Angeles, see the point.
And realize I am not making an argument for a global government here, but we also need some standardization there too, for aviation, which we do have, maritime, trade rules, and having the Central Banks work together so no one Central Bank doesn't destroy the entire global economy. See that point. We need SOME standardization, but we MUST retain regional variation. We do this at the Global Level, but we don't do it enough at our Federal Level with regards to the states in the US and that's why we have issues now. Think on this.
Lance Winslow is the Founder of the Online Think Tank, a diverse group of achievers, experts, innovators, entrepreneurs, thinkers, futurists, academics, dreamers, leaders, and general all around brilliant minds.
http://www.WorldThinkTank.net - Have an important subject to discuss, contact Lance Winslow. Lance also writes eBooks on all sorts of topics including this one, check out the selection.